Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00805
Original file (PD2013 00805.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX        CASE: PD13 00 805
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army   BOARD DATE: 2013 1127
Separation Date: 20061130


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (98C / Signals Intelligence Analyst) medically separated for right shoulder pain. The CI first reported shoulder pain following swim training in June 2005. This injury was treated conservatively (rest, physical therapy, medication and steroid injection; surgery was not advised) but could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or physical fitness standards. By early 2006 he was also complaining about various mental health (MH) symptoms. He was consequently referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The physical and MH conditions, characterized as “chronic right shoulder pain…” and “pain disorder associated with psychological factors and generalized medical condition . ” The PEB adjudicated “chronic right shoulder pain…” as unfitting, rated 20%, referencing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The remaining mental health condition was determined to be not unfitting. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : “The injury continues to hinder daily activities. Not being able to throw a football with my son, simple yard work, general household chores without pain or limitations impacts my day to day life and quality of living.”


 SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e . ( 2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. In addition, the CI was notified by the Army that his case may eligible for review of the military disability evaluation of any MH condition in accordance with Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred to a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnoses were changed or eliminated during that process. Since the CI responded to this mailing, it is presumed that he has elected review by the PDBR for the MH condition although he did not specifically contend for it on the DD Form 294. In accordance with Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of MH diagnoses that were changed during the Disability Evaluation System (DES) process, the applicant’s case file was reviewed regarding diagnosis change, fitness determination, and rating of unfitting MH diagnoses in accordance with the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) §4.129 and §4.130. The CI is also eligible for PDBR review of other conditions evaluated by the PEB and has elected review by the PDBR. The rating for the unfitting right shoulder condition and any MH conditions are addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.

The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected condition continues to burden him; but, must emphasize that the DES has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veteran s Affairs, operating under a different set of laws.


RATING COMPARISON :
invalid font number 31502
Service PEB – Dated 20060824
 VA - (2 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Right Shoulder Pain 5099-5003 20% Right Shoulder Impingement Syndrome 5299-5201 0% 20070201
Pain Disorder with Psychological Factors Not Unfitting Dysthymia 9433 0% 20070127
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x1 20070209
Combined: 20%
 Combined: 0%
VA ratings taken from VA R ating D ecision (VARD) dated 20040817 (most proximate to Date of Separation)

ANALYSIS SUMMARY :

Chronic Right Shoulder Pain Condition . The CI injured his right shoulder when he was pulled out of a pool by fellow soldiers during drowning safety training in June 2005. Three days later he was seen for right shoulder pain with findings of pain on lifting to ninety degrees, pain with flexion, extension and rotation. The examiner diagnosed right shoulder strain . Orthopedics evaluated the CI for right shoulder pain with exam findings of a positive O ’ B rien’s test shoulder , full range-of-motion ( ROM ) , tenderness to palpation ( TTP) on the anterior joint line and popping. The examiner diagnosed right shoulder sprain and possible labral tear. A magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI ) exam demonstrated mild tendonopathy and intrasubstance tear of the rotator cuff. A repeat MRI in October 2005 demonstrated intrasubstance tendonosis of the supraspinatus tendon from its insertion to the critical zone. Throughout 2005 and 2006, the CI continued to be followed by p rimary care for the right shoulder pain without improvement. In January 2006, the physical therapist noted that the CI had undergone therapy on and off for 6 months with a steady decline in function and an increase in pain . The c ommander’s s tatement noted that due to the CI’s Profile restrictions, he was unable to perform his MOS duties. The MEB n arrative s ummary (NARSUM) exam accomplished approximately 5 months prior to separation indicated that the CI underwent two right shoulder steroid injections with only temporary relief for 2 to 3 weeks. The CI had complaints of lack of mobility and loss of strength with steady pain and tightness that extended from the right upper chest to the back of the shoulder and along the right side of the neck, made worse with activity. The p ain varied in intensity from 5/10 with 10 being the worst pain on a good day to 8-9/10 on a bad day. He had discomfort if he slept o n his shoulder and required pain medication (Tramadol) at least once daily. He was unable to fire a shoulder type weapon, he could not wear a ruck sac k or body armor , he could not do push-ups or sit-ups and the pain was worse when he ran . The MEB NARSUM physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below . The CI was given a permanent U3 / S2 p rofile for chronic right shoulder pain; pain disorder associated with psychological factors and generalized medical condition with a specific restriction of no overhead work. The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 2 months after separation documented that despite a steroid injection , physical therapy (PT) and twice daily pain medication that he still had right shoulder pain. The examiner diagnosed right shoulder impingement syndrome. The C&P physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below .

There were two goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the chart below:
invalid font number 31502



Right Shoulder ROM (Degrees)
 MEB NARSUM ~5.5 Mos. Pre-Sep VA C&P ~2 Mos. Post-Sep
Flexion (180 Normal)
 (160,162,158) 160 120
Abduction (180)
 (160,158,162) 160 120
Comments
Right hand dominant
 Mild painful motion; pain with resisted shoulder flexion when arm pronated; Pos. anterior capsule laxity ; No atrophy No localized tenderness, swelling, deformity or instability; Motor-normal; No pain on ROM; No Deluca criteria
§4.71a Rating
 20% PEB 0%
invalid font number 31502
The Board directs attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB coded the chronic right shoulder pain condition as 5099 analogous to 5003 a rthritis, degenerative (hypertrophic or osteoarthritis) and rated it at 20% applying the USAPDA pain policy. The VA coded the right shoulder impingement syndrome as 5201 , limitation of motion of the arm, and rated it at 0%. At the time of the VA exam, the CI did not exhibit any localized tenderness or painful motion and there was no compensable ROM measured. Additionally, there was no indication that the motion was limited due to pain, weakness or fatigue on repetitive testing . The PEB applied th e USAPDA pain policy and rated the condition at 20% based on constant and moderate pain . The MEB NARSUM exam documents painful motion , and under VASRD §4.59, painful motion, would generate a rating of 10% for the shoulder joint with otherwise non-compensable ROM measurements. However, IAW DoDI 6040.44 the Board may not recommend a lower combined rating than that conferred by PEB. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the chronic right shoulder pain condition.

Contended PEB Condition. The Board determined that no MH diagnoses were changed to the CI's possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation process. This CI therefore did not meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project. The MH condition , p ain d isorder associated with p sychological f actors and g eneralized m edical c ondition , was determined to be not unfitting by the PEB. The Board’s charge with respect to the MH conditions referred for review that were determined to be not unfitting by the PEB is an assessment of the appropriateness of the PEB’s fitness adjudication. The Board ’s threshold for countering PEB not-unfit determinations requires a preponderance of evidence. Although the p ain d isorder associated with p sychological f actors and g eneralized m edical c ondition was profiled (S2) and implicated in the c ommander’s statement, it was not judged to fail retention standards by the MEB NARSUM psychiatrist or the PEB.

 The MEB MH NARSUM exam approximately 5 months prior to separation documented that the CI reported feeling down at times, low energy, irritability, decreased focus and concentration and insomnia due to pain at times. The examiner further documented that the CI became upset to know that he could not be as active as he once was nor could he play more physically challenging sports or activities due to his right shoulder condition. The MEB p sychiatrist diagnosed p ain d isorder associated with p sychological f actors and g eneralized m edical c ondition based on the fact that the disorder was a reaction to other circumstances (military stressors, health issues) or conditions. The C&P exam performed approximately 2 months after separation documented that the CI expressed a feeling of sadness because of the right shoulder pain and feelings of helplessness and problems sleeping due to the shoulder pain. These symptoms were continuous since the accident; however these symptoms had not caused time lost from work nor hospitalizations. He had full time employment. The mental status exam showed that although the CI reported his mood to be depressed, the psychiatrist noted the mood to be normal or at the most very mildly depressed, the rest of the exam was normal . The psychiatrist diagnosed Axis I: d ysthymia (mild chronic depression) with a Global Assessment of Functioning of 75 , i f symptoms are present they are transient and expectable reactions to psychosocial stressors; no more than slight impairment in social, occupational or school functioning.
The MH condition was reviewed and considered by the Board . There was no indication from the record that the MH condition significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. The applicant never had any loss of duty time due to his MH condition, nor did he require any psychiatric hospitalizations. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the MH condition ; and, therefore, no disability ratings can be recommended.
BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating the c hronic r ight s houlder p ain condition was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the c hronic r ight s houlder p ain condition IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the contended MH condition, p ain d isorder associated with p sychological f actors, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the PEB determination as not unfitting and therefore, it cannot recommend it for additional disability rating. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


 RECOMMENDATION : The Board therefore recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:
UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Right Shoulder Pain 5099-5003 2 0%
Pain Disorder associated with Psychological Factors Not Unfitting
COMBINED
 2 0%
invalid font number 31502

The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 130528 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record





XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , DAF
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20140003462 (PD201300805)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary
                                                      (Army Review Boards)


Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01246

    Original file (PD2013 01246.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated “right, dominant, shoulder pain… ,” “right hip pain,” and “bilateral heel pain and right ankle pain” as unfitting, rated 10%, 0% and 0% (respectively), citing criteria of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Right Shoulder Pain…5099-500310%Right Shoulder Arthritis5010-520110%20091125Right Hip Pain…5099-50030%Right Hip Bursitis5024-525210%Bilateral Heel Pain and Right Ankle Pain…52840%Stress Fracture,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01187

    Original file (PD 2013 01187.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Shoulder Pain5099-50030%Left Shoulder Pain, History of Dislocation5202-502410%Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x7 Rating: 0%Combined Rating: 40%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20060921 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. Chronic Left Shoulder Pain Condition . ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01693

    Original file (PD-2014-01693.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 Service IPEB – Dated 20060316VA - (3 Mos. Chronic Upper Back Pain Condition . The CI was seen in pain managementprior to deploying for pain medications due to the chronic clavicle and shoulder pain.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01982

    Original file (PD 2014 01982.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above) consistent with performance-based criteria in evidence at separation. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01713

    Original file (PD2013 01713.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain (LBP) status post (s/p) L5/S1 fusion” as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Should the Board judge that a condition was most likely incompatible with the specific duty requirements, a disability rating IAW the VASRD, based on the degree of disability evidenced at separation, will be recommended. invalid font number 31502 ” The CI had chronic LBP and ROM flexion limited to 80 degrees at the MEB exam.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02389

    Original file (PD-2013-02389.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The pain management examiner reevaluated the CI on 2 April 2008 and documented that there was residual pain, however the CI was not taking any pain medication; at rest the pain was zero to two and when he was actively working, the pain was in the three to five range. Additionally, the Board concluded, although the CI had some symptoms of depression, and depression might have been the predominant presentation of his adjustment disorder, there was insufficient evidence that any mental health...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01186

    Original file (PD 2013 01186.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Additionally, members agreed that the chronic low back pain and left shoulder pain conditions, as isolated conditions, would have rendered the CI incapable of continued service within his MOS and therefore each is separately unfitting and merits a separate rating. Physical Disability Board of Review Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original medical...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01682

    Original file (PD2013 01682.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated “ chronic right knee pain” as unfitting, rated 10% with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. Radiographs of the right knee noted mild degenerative changes but were otherwise within normal.The MEB examiner noted a pain rating of slight/frequent. The Board agreed that the CI’s disability due to the knee condition met the 10% rating...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01553

    Original file (PD-2013-01553.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The back and left shoulder conditions, characterized as “left shoulder rotator cuff tear, status post(s/p) repair and back pain secondary to T12 compression fracture” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00988

    Original file (PD2013 00988.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Right knee pain secondary to patellar tendonitis and shrapnel injury was diagnosed.The PT noted the need for ambulation with a cane and knee brace with strength limited by pain. The Board reviewed the MH conditions for “fitness” and possible rating (under VASRD 4.130) if determined to be “unfitting” for military service. Physical Disability Board of Review